Skip to content

Conversation

aeubanks
Copy link
Contributor

@aeubanks aeubanks commented May 6, 2024

llvm/llvm-project#89799 changes llvm.dbg.value/declare intrinsics to be in a different, out-of-instruction-line representation. For example
call void @llvm.dbg.declare(...)
becomes
#dbg_declare(...)

Update tests accordingly to work with both the old and new way.

llvm/llvm-project#89799 changes llvm.dbg.value/declare intrinsics to be in a different, out-of-instruction-line representation. For example
  call void @llvm.dbg.declare(...)
becomes
  #dbg_declare(...)

Update tests accordingly to work with both the old and new way.
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented May 6, 2024

r? @Mark-Simulacrum

rustbot has assigned @Mark-Simulacrum.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

@rustbot rustbot added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label May 6, 2024
@aeubanks
Copy link
Contributor Author

aeubanks commented May 6, 2024

@rustbot label: + llvm-main
r? @durin42

@rustbot rustbot assigned durin42 and unassigned Mark-Simulacrum May 6, 2024
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented May 6, 2024

Error: Parsing relabel command in comment failed: ...' label: +' | error: empty label at >| ' llvm-main'...

Please file an issue on GitHub at triagebot if there's a problem with this bot, or reach out on #t-infra on Zulip.

@aeubanks
Copy link
Contributor Author

aeubanks commented May 6, 2024

@rustbot label: +llvm-main
r? @durin42

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented May 6, 2024

Could not assign reviewer from: durin42.
User(s) durin42 are either the PR author, already assigned, or on vacation, and there are no other candidates.
Use r? to specify someone else to assign.

@rustbot rustbot added the llvm-main Marks PRs that are making Rust work with LLVM main (this label is consumed by CI tooling) label May 6, 2024
@durin42
Copy link
Contributor

durin42 commented May 6, 2024

That is...exactly the cursed FileCheck hackery I didn't want to spend the brainpower on. Many many thanks.

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented May 7, 2024

📌 Commit 6c348ac has been approved by durin42

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels May 7, 2024
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented May 7, 2024

⌛ Testing commit 6c348ac with merge 5ae5d13...

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented May 7, 2024

☀️ Test successful - checks-actions
Approved by: durin42
Pushing 5ae5d13 to master...

@bors bors added the merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. label May 7, 2024
@bors bors merged commit 5ae5d13 into rust-lang:master May 7, 2024
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.80.0 milestone May 7, 2024
@rust-timer
Copy link
Collaborator

Finished benchmarking commit (5ae5d13): comparison URL.

Overall result: ❌ regressions - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

This is a highly reliable metric that was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
1.4% [1.4%, 1.4%] 1
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
- - 0
All ❌✅ (primary) - - 0

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
1.3% [1.3%, 1.3%] 1
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
4.2% [4.2%, 4.2%] 1
Improvements ✅
(primary)
- - 0
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
- - 0
All ❌✅ (primary) 1.3% [1.3%, 1.3%] 1

Cycles

Results

This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.

mean range count
Regressions ❌
(primary)
- - 0
Regressions ❌
(secondary)
3.5% [2.9%, 4.0%] 5
Improvements ✅
(primary)
-2.2% [-3.1%, -1.3%] 2
Improvements ✅
(secondary)
- - 0
All ❌✅ (primary) -2.2% [-3.1%, -1.3%] 2

Binary size

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Bootstrap: 675.496s -> 673.849s (-0.24%)
Artifact size: 315.97 MiB -> 315.95 MiB (-0.01%)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
llvm-main Marks PRs that are making Rust work with LLVM main (this label is consumed by CI tooling) merged-by-bors This PR was explicitly merged by bors. S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants